I have noticed that my juniors that only have a two star rating in their highest and a two star rating in their lowest potential often turn out to be decent players...
The players that I am referring to are the once that on paper look like they should be pretty bad since their highest potential is a two star rating and the scout reports read:
"xxx is versatile but seems to lack any real key strengths. I would be careful about investing too much of our club funds into his development, but you are the boss."
For example; one of my players with a highest potential rating of two stars in "ball control" and "set plays" is currently training "shooting" and has 7balls and is not maxed in that attribute yet?
And I am not complaining but has more people noticed this with the 2star players?